
Yes. You can sue the NYPD for false arrest or excessive force in NYC when officers arrested you without probable cause or used more force than the situation allowed. These claims can be brought against the individual officers, and often against the City of New York, under federal civil rights law, New York State law, and a 2021 New York City law.
The deadlines are short, and some start running the day of the arrest. Our NYC police misconduct and civil rights attorneys represent people across Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, and Staten Island in lawsuits against the NYPD and the City of New York. Partner John P. Buza and our civil rights trial team prepare these cases for trial from the first meeting.
If you were arrested without cause or hurt by an officer, schedule a free consultation to talk about your options and your deadlines.
You can sue the NYPD for a false arrest in NYC when an officer took you into custody without probable cause. Probable cause means facts that would lead a reasonable officer to believe you committed a crime. If no such facts existed, the arrest violated your rights, even if you were released hours later without charges.
A false arrest claim focuses on what the officer knew at the moment of the arrest, not on what happened in court afterward. A judge or jury looks at the facts available to the officer on the street, in the subway station, or at your door, and asks whether those facts were enough to justify taking you into custody.
To win a false arrest claim, a person generally has to show:
Probable cause for any offense, even one different from the charge written on the paperwork, generally defeats a false arrest claim. That is why the details matter: what the officer saw, what a complainant or witness told the officer, and whether the officer ignored facts that pointed to your innocence. Our NYC civil rights lawyers often see false arrest claims arise from mistaken identity, arrests of bystanders at protests or parades, arrests based on an unreliable 911 call, and arrests of people who were recording the police.
A false arrest claim is different from a malicious prosecution claim. Malicious prosecution covers a criminal case that was started or continued without probable cause and for an improper reason. It usually requires the criminal case to have ended in your favor first. Our NYC civil rights attorneys often evaluate both claims together, because a bad arrest frequently leads to a bad prosecution. For background on a related claim, see what false imprisonment means.
You can sue the NYPD for excessive force in NYC when an officer used more force than a reasonable officer would have used in the same situation. The force does not have to cause a broken bone. Punches, baton strikes, pepper spray, Taser use, chokeholds, slamming someone to the ground, and handcuffs left painfully tight can all support a claim.
Courts judge excessive force by what a reasonable officer would have done, not by the officer’s intentions. A judge or jury is allowed to consider factors such as:
Force used after a person is handcuffed or has stopped moving is a common basis for these claims. So is force used on someone who was never suspected of a crime at all, such as a person filming an arrest on a Bronx sidewalk or a commuter caught in a crowd at a Midtown subway station. Excessive force claims can be brought even when the arrest itself was lawful. Our police brutality and excessive force practice covers these cases in more depth, and our earlier post explains what counts as excessive force.
After NYPD misconduct in NYC, a lawsuit can name the individual officers who arrested you or used force, officers who watched and failed to step in, and the City of New York. The NYPD itself is a City agency, so claims against the department are brought against the City of New York.
Each defendant is liable under different rules:
Identifying every officer matters. Arrest paperwork, body-worn camera footage, radio runs, and precinct records can show who was present. Our NYC civil rights attorneys request these records early so no responsible officer is left out of the lawsuit.
The deadline to sue the NYPD in NYC depends on the claim. New York State law claims against the City require a notice of claim within 90 days and a lawsuit within one year and 90 days. Federal civil rights claims and claims under the 2021 City law generally must be filed within three years.
Missing the 90-day notice of claim deadline can shut down the state-law claims against the City entirely unless a court grants permission to file late, which is not guaranteed. The key timelines look like this:
Different claims from the same incident can have different start dates. A false arrest clock, an excessive force clock, and a malicious prosecution clock may all run on separate schedules. Filing a complaint with the CCRB or waiting for the criminal case to end does not pause the 90-day notice of claim deadline.
A notice of claim against the NYPD in NYC must be in writing and filed with the New York City Comptroller’s Office. It must describe who you are, what happened, when and where it happened, how it happened, and what injuries or damages you suffered. Vague or incorrect details can create problems later in the lawsuit.
The notice of claim is the City’s first official look at your case, and it is treated as a sworn account. It generally needs to include:
The Comptroller’s Office accepts filings through its eClaim system and by other methods it lists. A notice of claim can be amended within the 90-day window. After 90 days, changing it generally requires a court motion. Because anything written in the notice can be compared with your later testimony, our NYC civil rights lawyers prepare it carefully and keep it consistent with the medical records and arrest paperwork.
After you file a notice of claim against the NYPD in NYC, the Comptroller’s Office assigns a claim number and investigates. The City can demand a hearing where you answer questions under oath about the incident and your injuries. You must wait at least 30 days after filing and attend any demanded hearing before you can sue on the state-law claims.
This hearing is often called a 50-h hearing. It is not a trial and no judge is present. A lawyer for the City asks you questions about the arrest, the force used, your injuries, your medical treatment, and your work. The session is transcribed, and the City may later use the transcript to challenge your account. The City may also ask you to attend a physical examination with a doctor it chooses.
The Comptroller’s Office has authority to settle claims before a lawsuit is filed, but only up to one year and 90 days from the incident. Waiting on the Comptroller does not extend the deadline to file in court. Our NYC civil rights attorneys prepare clients for the hearing the same way they prepare for a deposition: by reviewing the records, the timeline, and the questions the City is likely to ask.
Qualified immunity can stop some federal claims against NYPD officers in NYC, but not all of them. It does not apply to claims under the 2021 New York City law covering unreasonable searches, seizures, and excessive force. It also does not protect the City of New York itself.
Qualified immunity is a defense created by federal courts. It shields an officer from personal liability on a federal claim unless the officer violated a right that was clearly established by earlier court decisions at the time. In practice, the officer argues that no prior case gave fair warning that the specific conduct was unlawful.
In 2021, the New York City Council created a local right to be free from unreasonable searches, seizures, and excessive force. Under that law:
Many lawsuits against the NYPD bring federal, state, and City claims together, so a qualified immunity ruling on one claim does not necessarily end the case. Our NYC civil rights lawyers plead every claim the facts support.
You can file a notice of claim against the NYPD while your criminal case in NYC is still open, and you often must, to protect the 90-day deadline. A malicious prosecution claim usually has to wait until the criminal case ends in your favor. Anything you say in the civil case can affect the criminal case.
An open criminal case changes the strategy. Statements in a notice of claim or at the City’s hearing are made under oath and can be shared with the District Attorney’s Office in Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, or Staten Island. For that reason, a civil rights lawsuit and an open criminal case need to be coordinated, so nothing filed in one hurts the other.
How the criminal case ends also matters. A dismissal, an acquittal, a plea to a lesser offense, or an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal can each affect which civil claims are available and how strong they are. A guilty plea or conviction on a related charge can limit or bar some claims. Our NYC civil rights attorneys review the criminal court file before advising on the civil case.
No. A Civilian Complaint Review Board complaint in NYC is not a lawsuit and cannot award you money. The CCRB investigates complaints about NYPD force, abuse of authority, discourtesy, and offensive language, and can recommend discipline. A lawsuit is the only way to seek compensation for your injuries and losses.
Many people file with the CCRB first and assume that protects their legal rights. It does not. Filing a CCRB complaint does not stop the 90-day notice of claim deadline or any statute of limitations. A CCRB finding can still be useful evidence, and the investigation may produce body-worn camera footage and officer statements. Our post on filing a civil rights complaint against a NYC police officer explains the complaint process in more detail. People stopped because of race, religion, or other protected traits can also read about suing the NYPD for a bias-based stop.
The most useful evidence in a false arrest or excessive force claim in NYC is created in the first days: photos of injuries, medical records, video from phones and nearby cameras, witness names, and the arrest paperwork. Store and building cameras often record over footage within days or weeks, so requests need to go out quickly.
Steps that help preserve a claim:
Body-worn camera footage, radio transmissions, 911 recordings, and use-of-force reports are held by the NYPD and the City. Our NYC civil rights lawyers send preservation demands and seek these records through the legal process.
Damages in a lawsuit against the NYPD in NYC can include compensation for physical injuries, emotional distress, time spent in custody, medical expenses, and lost earnings. Punitive damages may be available against individual officers in some civil rights claims. No one can predict a dollar amount before the evidence is developed.
The categories of damages a judge or jury may consider include:
Federal civil rights law also allows a court to award attorney’s fees to a plaintiff who wins. The value of a claim depends on factors such as:
An NYC civil rights lawyer can protect your deadlines, gather evidence before it disappears, identify every responsible officer, plead every available claim, and prepare your case for trial so the City has to deal with the full value of your claim. Our civil rights attorneys handle each stage from the first call through trial or resolution.
Our NYC civil rights attorneys work through these stages:
A fair settlement is welcome. One that shortchanges the client is not, and our trial team prepares every case as if it will be tried.
If you were arrested without cause or injured by an NYPD officer, the 90-day notice of claim deadline may already be running. Schedule a free consultation with Konta Georges & Buza P.C. to discuss what happened and which claims may be available. Our office is in the Woolworth Building, 233 Broadway, Suite 701, New York, NY 10279.
Call us at (212) 710-5166 24/7 to arrange to speak with a lawyer about your case, or contact us through the website today.

Fields Marked With An “ * ” Are Required
"*" indicates required fields
The Woolworth Building
233 Broadway
Suite 701
New York, NY 10279